public-ldp-wg@w3.org from May 2013 by author

Alexandre Bertails

• Re: ISSUE-75 (was ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example) (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 22 May)

Andy Seaborne

• Re: LDP agenda for May 6 (Friday, 3 May)

Arnaud Le Hors

• Re: ldp-ISSUE-79 (ldp:contains): ldp:contains (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ISSUE-75 (was ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example) (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Thursday, 30 May)
• LDP agenda for June 3 (Thursday, 30 May)
• Proposal to close ISSUE-63: Need to be able to specify collation with container ordering per Ashok's suggestion (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 30 May)
• Open issues at risk (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 30 May)
• LDP F2F3 agenda (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: section 4.1.5 (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Proposal to close ISSUE-67: Full container membership without pagination, saying no. (Friday, 24 May)
• Proposal to close ISSUE-19: Adressing more error cases, as is (Friday, 24 May)
• Proposal to close ISSUE-17: changesets as a recommended PATCH format, as is (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 24 May)
• LDP Minutes for May 13 and May 20 (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 22 May)
• LDP F2F @ TPAC? (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (Sunday, 19 May)
• LDP Agenda for May 20 (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: Server behaviour on PUT (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: Need new Product(s) in Tracker (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: Define a minimal restriction on LDPR representations (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: Proposal to close Issue-65: FirstPage HATEOAS Compliance (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Proposal to close Issue-65: FirstPage HATEOAS Compliance (Friday, 10 May)
• LDP Agenda for May 13 (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: First draft of test cases (Friday, 10 May)
• Proposal to close Issue-65: FirstPage HATEOAS Compliance (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: LDP minutes for May 6 (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? (Thursday, 9 May)
• Proposal to close ISSUE-69, as is (Monday, 6 May)
• LDP minutes for May 6 (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: LDP Issues list maintenance (Monday, 6 May)
• LDP Issues list maintenance (Monday, 6 May)
• LDP agenda for May 6 (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: PUT,POST,PATCH of <> a ldp:Container (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: membershipSubject clarification (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-62 (siblings): Creating Sibling Containers [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 1 May)

Ashok Malhotra

• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: An LDP example with and without membershipSubject predicate (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: An LDP example with and without membershipSubject predicate (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: LD 5th Element ? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: LDP F2F @ TPAC? (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Sunday, 19 May)
• ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: Define a minimal restriction on LDPR representations (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? (Thursday, 9 May)
• Fwd: Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? (Thursday, 9 May)
• Fwd: Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? (Thursday, 9 May)
• Do we need transaction support in LDP? (Thursday, 9 May)

Cody Burleson

• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-17: changesets as a recommended PATCH format, as is (Saturday, 25 May)

David Wood

• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: LDP F2F @ TPAC? (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: Status codes for DELETE (Friday, 17 May)
• How much REST should your web API get? (Monday, 6 May)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: First draft of test cases (Monday, 20 May)

Henry Story

• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 31 May)
• ISSUE-79 ldp:contains (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-79 (ldp:contains): ldp:contains (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ISSUE-75 Non-montonic - was: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ISSUE-75 Non-montonic - was: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-79 (ldp:contains): ldp:contains (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 31 May)
• ISSUE-75 Non-montonic - was: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-78 (inferencing): inferencing levels [Linked Data Platform Spec] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-78 (inferencing): inferencing levels [Linked Data Platform Spec] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-67: Full container membership without pagination, saying no. (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-67: Full container membership without pagination, saying no. (Saturday, 25 May)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-17: changesets as a recommended PATCH format, as is (Saturday, 25 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-74 (conditional requests required): How does a client know if conditional requests are required [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Tuesday, 21 May)
• ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Tuesday, 21 May)
• membershipX: the first bug tracking example (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: Recommendation for concise definition of LDPR (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (Saturday, 18 May)
• Conclusion -- Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-70 (simple LDPCs): simple LDPCs [Linked Data Platform core] (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: Recommendation for concise definition of LDPR (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Wednesday, 15 May)
• ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: Proposal to close Issue-65: FirstPage HATEOAS Compliance (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: Access Control Requirements (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: membershipSubject clarification (Wednesday, 8 May)
• PUT,POST,PATCH of <> a ldp:Container (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: membershipSubject clarification (Thursday, 2 May)

John Arwe

• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ISSUE-75 Non-montonic - was: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-78 (inferencing): inferencing levels [Linked Data Platform Spec] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-63: Need to be able to specify collation with container ordering per Ashok's suggestion (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ISSUE-75 Non-montonic - was: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: section 4.1.5 (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ISSUE-75 Non-montonic - was: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ISSUE-75 (was ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example) (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-67: Full container membership without pagination, saying no. (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-17: changesets as a recommended PATCH format, as is (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: Binary resource and metadata example (ISSUE-15) (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Issue-64 (Non-member-properties HATEOAS Compliance) proposal to resolve (Thursday, 23 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-32 (affordances): new issues coming (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: LD 5th Element ? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: Server behaviour on PUT (Monday, 20 May)
• Need new Product(s) in Tracker (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: Issue-32 affordances (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: Define a minimal restriction on LDPR representations (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: Status codes for DELETE (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: LDP minutes for May 6 (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: LDP minutes for May 6 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-62 (siblings): Creating Sibling Containers [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: membershipSubject clarification (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: PUT,POST,PATCH of <> a ldp:Container (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: membershipSubject clarification (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-62 (siblings): Creating Sibling Containers [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (Wednesday, 1 May)

Kingsley Idehen

• Looking Up Issues Using Linked Data URIs (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-79 (ldp:contains): ldp:contains (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ISSUE-75 Non-montonic - was: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: LD 5th Element ? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: LD 5th Element ? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: LD 5th Element ? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: LD 5th Element ? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: Proposal to close Issue-65: FirstPage HATEOAS Compliance (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: Access Control Requirements (Thursday, 9 May)

Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker

• ldp-ISSUE-79 (ldp:contains): ldp:contains (Friday, 31 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-78 (inferencing): inferencing levels [Linked Data Platform Spec] (Friday, 31 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 30 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-76 (rename membershipXXX): rename the ldp:membershipXXX properties [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 29 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 29 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-74 (conditional requests required): How does a client know if conditional requests are required [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 23 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 23 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 22 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-71 (membershipX): No membershipSubject or membershipPredicate [Linked Data Platform core] (Tuesday, 21 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-70 (simple LDPCs): simple LDPCs [Linked Data Platform core] (Saturday, 18 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-69: Query syntaxes for accessing the first and subsequent pages (Monday, 6 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-68: Number of resources per page (Monday, 6 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-67: Full container membership without pagination (Monday, 6 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-66: Robust pagination [Linked Data Platform core] (Monday, 6 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-65 (FirstPage HATEOAS Compliance): FirstPage and Hypermedia as the Engine of Application State (HATEOAS) Compliance [Linked Data Platform core] (Monday, 6 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-64 (Non-member-properties HATEOAS Compliance): Non-member-properties and Hypermedia as the Engine of Application State (HATEOAS) Compliance [Linked Data Platform core] (Monday, 6 May)
• ldp-ISSUE-63 (Collation Support): Need to be able to specify collation with container ordering [Linked Data Platform core] (Monday, 6 May)

Nandana Mihindukulasooriya

• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Binary resource and metadata example (ISSUE-15) (Monday, 27 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Thursday, 23 May)
• Specification edits for Issue-54 resolution (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 22 May)
• An LDP example with and without membershipSubject predicate (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: An editorial suggestion for 5.2.2 in the spec (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: Issue-32 affordances (Tuesday, 14 May)
• An editorial suggestion for 5.2.2 in the spec (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: PUT,POST,PATCH of <> a ldp:Container (Friday, 3 May)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: Recommendation for concise definition of LDPR (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: PUT,POST,PATCH of <> a ldp:Container (Thursday, 2 May)

Raúl García Castro

• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: Server behaviour on PUT (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: Define a minimal restriction on LDPR representations (Friday, 17 May)
• Define a minimal restriction on LDPR representations (Thursday, 16 May)
• HEAD vs OPTIONS (Thursday, 16 May)
• Status codes for DELETE (Thursday, 16 May)
• Alternatives for using ETags (Thursday, 16 May)
• Server behaviour on PUT (Thursday, 16 May)
• First draft of test cases (Friday, 10 May)

Richard Cyganiak

• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Wednesday, 15 May)

Roger Menday

• Re: ldp-ISSUE-78 (inferencing): inferencing levels [Linked Data Platform Spec] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 30 May)
• section 4.1.5 (Wednesday, 29 May)
• container-first or entity-first ? (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 23 May)
• membershipPredicates or not ? (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: An LDP example with and without membershipSubject predicate (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: LD 5th Element ? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: LD 5th Element ? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: LD 5th Element ? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• LD 5th Element ? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-62 (siblings): Creating Sibling Containers [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: membershipSubject clarification (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: LDP agenda for May 6 (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: membershipSubject clarification (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-62 (siblings): Creating Sibling Containers [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-62 (siblings): Creating Sibling Containers [Linked Data Platform core] (Wednesday, 1 May)

Sergio Fernández

• Re: LDP Agenda for May 20 (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: membershipSubject clarification (Monday, 6 May)

Steve Speicher

• Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: Binary resource and metadata example (ISSUE-15) (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: An LDP example with and without membershipSubject predicate (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: Specification edits for Issue-54 resolution (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: LDP F2F @ TPAC? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: Recommendation for concise definition of LDPR (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: Recommendation for specification edits (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: Server behaviour on PUT (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: Alternatives for using ETags (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: HEAD vs OPTIONS (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: Status codes for DELETE (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: An editorial suggestion for 5.2.2 in the spec (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: An editorial suggestion for 5.2.2 in the spec (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (Monday, 6 May)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• Regrets for May 20 & 27 (Memorial Day, USA) (Monday, 13 May)

Wilde, Erik

• ISSUE-67 (Friday, 31 May)
• ISSUE-56/ISSUE-57 (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: Status codes for DELETE (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: Proposal to close Issue-65: FirstPage HATEOAS Compliance (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: How much REST should your web API get? (Tuesday, 7 May)

Last message date: Friday, 31 May 2013 21:27:55 UTC