Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core]

> yes. the language would need to be tuned. I was just trying to make 

"tuned"??  it completely changes the meaning for Pete's sake.
The spec already requires all members to be listed - that is the intent 
and purpose of membership triples.

The proposal as written says the container must list all members it 
created via rdfs:member ... which is (the created-only part at least) is 
not something the spec exactly covers today, so that's a reasonable point 
of discussion.  Today's spec covers a superset (created by the container + 
those added via other means).

The "tuned" version then nets out to "remove ldp:membershipPredicate and 
force the use of rdfs:member", correct?    Just so we're clear about what 
we're talking about, rather than hiding it in a list of pro's.


Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario