- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 15:15:16 -0400
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF601890A0.D0C7814C-ON85257B7C.0069BF5D-85257B7C.0069C587@us.ibm.com>
I can live with that. Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 05/30/2013 12:17:53 PM: > From: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS > To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org, > Date: 05/30/2013 12:27 PM > Subject: Proposal to close ISSUE-63: Need to be able to specify > collation with container ordering per Ashok's suggestion > > Ashok raised this issue saying: > > I propose that we add an optional container property > ldp:containerSortCollation. When this property is present the > ordering should use the 3 parameter fn:compare(A,B,C) function. If > the property is absent the 2 parameter fn:compare(A,B) function > should be used. > > This looks like a straightforward way of addressing the problem and > I therefore propose we accept Ashok's solution and close the issue. > > Regards. > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Friday, 31 May 2013 19:15:46 UTC