Re: Proposal to close Issue-65: FirstPage HATEOAS Compliance

Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote on 05/10/2013 10:05:09 AM:

> On 5/10/13 12:52 PM, Wilde, Erik wrote:
> > hello arnaud.
> > ...
> > a more sophisticated design would be to use URI templates and allow
> > clients to request specific pages, but then you would want to 
advertise
> > the URI template and expose the variables in it, so that clients could
> > request representations with explicit values for things such as page 
size,
> > or page number.
> +1 for the more sophisticated approach. We actually use that approach in 

> some of our endeavors.
> 

Then it will have to be deferred. There is no way we can take the time to 
get this done for this version of the spec.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group