- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 07:55:25 -0700
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF9B78E59E.7C2AF17C-ON88257B7A.00500DB2-88257B7A.0051FA25@us.ibm.com>
Hi Henry, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote on 05/29/2013 07:18:39 AM: > ... > There are two things: > 1. members of an LDPC are added via the rdf:member relation > 2. other relations that get added when you POST content to an LDPC: membershipXXX > I believe what you're suggesting is similar to the way we considered resolving ISSUE-59 (option B) [1] and the WG decided against it [2]. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Apr/0123.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-04-29#resolution_5 As the minutes show I personally preferred that way too but the WG decided against it and I'm not convinced you've made the case for reversing that decision. > It's up to you to specify what the point of adding those relations is. There is nothing in the UC&R for it, so I can't > really tell, and their addition was not discussed in this WG. I think it's fair to say that the UC&R may not cover every use case and requirements the Member Submission addressed and which we have inherited. This has been acknowledged. But Steve has sent an email [3] explaining the motivation for membershipPredicate/Subject to fill in that gap so I don't think it helps to keep repeating there is no use case for it. [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013May/0250.html > > > The ldp:memberXXX relations would probably best be renamed > > don't necessarily have anything to do with rdf:member. So naming them that > > That's cognitively interesting. I see you stop reading after member. I stop after 4 additional letters (-shipXXX). See the world in a grain of sand. > > > > ldp:relationshipPredicate, ... would also be fine. As Arnaud has pointed out a few times on this list an ldp:relationshipPredicate > object need not be a subProperty of rdf:member. I have said that indeed. This doesn't mean membershipPredicate has nothing to do with rdf:member. rdf:member is the default value of membershipPredicate, which is the property that defines the predicate used to link member resources to the container. Regards. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2013 14:56:18 UTC