- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 18:25:10 -0400
- To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <B4EF9FDC-0722-4A51-91E2-E5FBE1972CE4@3roundstones.com>
Hi Arnaud, I won't be able to be at TPAC. Regards, Dave -- http://about.me/david_wood On May 20, 2013, at 16:23, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi all, > On the call today Eric brought up the question of whether we were planning to meet at TPAC. I said I hadn't seen anything about that yet but in fact I've found that a request was sent to the chairs several weeks ago about this. Oops. > The event is in China, the week of November 11-15: > > TPAC 2013 > 11-15 November 2013 > Shenzhen, China > Tencent is the Exclusive TPAC Host > http://www.w3.org/2013/11/TPAC/ > > Given that we won't have another call for another 2 weeks I'd like to ask whether people think we should plan for this or not? > > Here is my perspective: > > Pros: > It's always nice to participate in TPAC. > Going to China is nice. > > Cons: > November isn't when we would normally meet next if we stay on a meeting every 3 months. That would be 5 months after Madrid. > We don't have a need to meet with any other group at this time. > China is far (takes time and it's expensive) > > The Cons outweigh the Pros, I think. > > Do you think you would be able to go if we did meet at TPAC? > > Thanks. > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Monday, 20 May 2013 22:25:35 UTC