Re: LDP minutes for May 6

Thanks for the careful review, John.

In general "unattributed remarks" in the minutes are from the scribe. The 
only way to prevent this is for the scribe to attribute their remarks to 
themselves and write something like "Arnaud: blah blah blah" as if it had 
been said by someone else.

As for the -1, I agree that it's good practice to ask people to explain 
why they object. There was no time for this on Monday.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group




From:   John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS
To:     public-ldp-wg@w3.org, 
Date:   05/08/2013 06:32 AM
Subject:        Re: LDP minutes for May 6



A mangled link at the start of issue-32 discussion 
> Ted Thibodeau: ISSUE-32.pdf">
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Apr/att-0139/W3C
ISSUE-32.pdf ? 
Unattributed remark (from scribe?) 
> I see no issues with profile construct 
same here (pretty sure this was ScribeSteve) 
> +.5, +.4, +1 (but would like the value to be etag), +0 
I also see in the -58 discussion (straw poll at end) some -1's but no 
information on Why people object.  That seems critical to moving the 
discussion along.  Cody, Sergio, EricP, Miel  could you share the driving 
issues behind each of your -1 entries? 
Arnaud: that last - sharing of -1 reasons - seems like a good norm going 
forward. 
Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages 
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario 




From:        Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS 
To:        public-ldp-wg@w3.org, 
Date:        05/06/2013 06:44 PM 
Subject:        LDP minutes for May 6 



The minutes for today's call are now available for review: 
https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-05-06
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group