- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 07:19:09 -0400
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFD886B395.F3A74067-ON85257B78.0050ECA6-85257B79.003E2ECB@us.ibm.com>
> or remotely. You are not stuck with only dealing with locally > described resources. The LDPC as a creator of resources on the > other is forced to only have local members: ie point to > resources that can be PATCHed, DELETEd, ... and so that it is in > control of. Henry, what do you mean by local members? I could interpret this to be saying that the implementation of an LDPC _must not_ delegate its create implementation onto another server that mints arbitrary URLs (URLs with no discernible relationship to the LDPC's URL). I.e. local members are those whose URLs are "on the same server", and probably served by some common software components in the dispatch chain. Which is an interpretation I find no support for in any edition of the spec. Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 11:19:46 UTC