Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation

> This issue of knowing which triples belong to which resource applies
> to equally to all the four options, right ? Though we discuss it in 

The options are asserting markedly different things.
All of them do assert (at the RDF level) that the response triples include 
all the triples one would get by retrieving the named members as well.
None of them make any assertion about the correspondence between HTTP 
resources and triples returned.
That is sufficient for the simplest container-client case (query).  I 
think it wholly insufficient for any scenario involving later replacement 
(PUT) of the intervening resources, in the absence of assumptions about 
the relationship between triple subjects and HTTP resources (other 
thread).  In other words, if you intend to replace the members later I do 
not see how you are going to avoid getting those members first.  PATCH, 
being more incremental, might be less of an issue.

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario

Received on Monday, 6 May 2013 14:16:24 UTC