- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 14:49:25 -0400
- To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 9 May 2013 18:50:04 UTC
Forwarding note from Melvin Carvalho -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 19:33:28 +0200 From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> On 9 May 2013 15:43, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com <mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>> wrote: Do we need transaction support in LDP? One of the big features of LDP wrt to the rest of the Web is that it is read/write. If clients can update information then we need to say something about transaction support. This could be along the lines of the note on Access Control. BTW, I have not seen any comments on my latest suggestion re. Access Control. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Apr/0109.html Please take a look and comment. Additionally you may be interested in this spec at the IETF which covers remote data stores, containers, access control and versioning https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-dejong-remotestorage-00.txt -- All the best, Ashok
Received on Thursday, 9 May 2013 18:50:04 UTC