Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core]

On 30 May 2013, at 16:51, Arnaud Le Hors <> wrote:

> Hi Roger, 
> It is important, especially that late in the process, to be as specific as possible when opening issues. As I said before I think the issue you raised is totally reasonable but as you entered it into the system you've made it much more general and less actionable. 
> The issue shouldn't be entered as a question and shouldn't be open ended. Instead it should set what the problem is and include a proposal on how to address it. So, I suggest the following changes: 
> Title: Requiring that an LDPR MUST declare its type is excessive 
> Description: 
> Section 4.1.5 of the specification states: 
> "LDPRs MUST use the predicate rdf:type to represent the concept of type." 

I think this is related to ISSUE-78 I opened on inferencing levels. If no inferencing
is required of the client, then section 4.1.5 can be justified very simply by reference
to this.


Social Web Architect

Received on Friday, 31 May 2013 09:31:09 UTC