Re: ISSUE-75 (was ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example)

>  What about even simply knowing that you're dealing with a 
> container in the first place? You could be parsing a whole resource 
> before discovering a triple that tells you that you're dealing with 
> an ldp:Container, couldn't you? 

Yup.  Of course we do still have -32 open, so maybe there is hope at the 
HTTP level.
Of course, [cruelly setting the reader up and then knocking him/her down] 
if you wanted to solve cases like this one specifically with something 
like Link rel="type" you have to remember that it the response might not 
be "an" ldp:Container, it might be 'n' containers.  Which has its own 
perverse edge cases like the solution bloating the payload to 2x or so 
what it would otherwise be.


Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario