Re: ldp-ISSUE-62 (siblings): Creating Sibling Containers [Linked Data Platform core]

> > Every LDPR has a representation with a number of triples. 
> > An LDPC is a subset of those triples - same-subject, same-predicate. 
> > That's what I mean by 'inside' - maybe I should've used 'subset'. 

> Well, they are related by definition because in the same-subject, 
> same-predicate definition of a LDPC it has a single LDPR resource as
> the same-subject. I would hope that HTTP client can discover this - 
> using the membershipSubject triple for example. 

same-subject, same-predicate is NOT the definition of a LDPC.  It is the 
definition of Membership Triples.  an LDPC has additional triples, e.g. 
<memb-subj, a, ldp:Container>

I do not see where in the spec (I checked Editor's draft, but I'm pretty 
sure none his would be affected by the choice) it says that the membership 
subject MUST be an LDPR.  Indeed, doing so would (definitionally) preclude 
the use of hash URIs for membership subjects, since the spec DOES define 
an LDPR as an HTTP resource (which, to render an assumption explicit, I 
read to mean that the LDPR is identified by its HTTP request-uri, and 
those NEVER include a fragment component in 2616).

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario

Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 12:53:46 UTC