- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 11:17:15 -0400
- To: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFDE2B71A4.B58527B7-ON85257B7C.00522FC6-85257B7C.0053FB19@us.ibm.com>
"Looping back" to this per my earlier-today email.
> > > It is clear from the examples Nandana put together with the bug
> > > tracking examples, that the LDPCs never
> > > listed any of the members themselves. Nobody seemed to think that
> > > was odd. See for example
Ok, looking at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013May/0169.html model
2, I see we have another case of reading the same [email prose above]
content in different ways.
Indeed, the subset of the example in Model 2 you refer to,
------
<http://example.org/app/BugTracker/products/> a ldp:Container;
ldp:membershipSubject <http://example.org/app/BugTracker>;
ldp:membershipPredicate bt:tracksProduct .
------
does not look odd, b/c my brain (aka wetware LDP client) follows (tries to
follow?) the spec as currently written, so it knows (follows the "rule" as
you called it in later emails) that in order to find this container's
membership triples, (logically) query for the triple pattern < /BugTracker
, bt:tracksProduct , ? >.
> But that one is meant to guess from looking at the BugTracker resource
that
> members were created.
s/created/listed/ , but that aside I understand your point.
I don't think that following what you call the rule is a guess however.
Modulo the Raul-instigated discussion on how accurately the rules are
expressed in the existing text, following the spec when constructing
examples aligned with the spec and interpreting them according to the spec
seems natural, not odd, and is not a guess.
Fair to say that the existence of rules like this has effects elsewhere
(e.g. Pierre-Antoine's thread) and propose changing (e.g. doing without)
them. (20-20 hindsight of course) helpful for those of us not in your
head and/or more casual readers of these threads (like you, we don't get
to all of them at once) to bang us over the head with the statement that
you're talking about a rule-change.
Best Regards, John
Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
Received on Friday, 31 May 2013 15:17:44 UTC