- From: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 11:08:16 -0400
- To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOUJ7Jp+MEuaMQA5HirgDgLVxu+zRfc+i-ShHd8LWBuu==c66g@mail.gmail.com>
>> Do you think you would be able to go if we did meet at TPAC? I could make it, pending usual approvals. On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi all, > On the call today Eric brought up the question of whether we were planning > to meet at TPAC. I said I hadn't seen anything about that yet but in fact > I've found that a request was sent to the chairs several weeks ago about > this. Oops. > The event is in China, the week of November 11-15: > > TPAC 2013 > 11-15 November 2013 > Shenzhen, China > Tencent is the Exclusive TPAC Host > http://www.w3.org/2013/11/TPAC/ > > Given that we won't have another call for another 2 weeks I'd like to ask > whether people think we should plan for this or not? > > Here is my perspective: > > Pros: > It's always nice to participate in TPAC. > Going to China is nice. > > Cons: > November isn't when we would normally meet next if we stay on a meeting > every 3 months. That would be 5 months after Madrid. > We don't have a need to meet with any other group at this time. > China is far (takes time and it's expensive) > > The Cons outweigh the Pros, I think. > > Do you think you would be able to go if we did meet at TPAC? > > Thanks. > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group > -- - Steve
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2013 15:08:47 UTC