- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 09:26:07 -0400
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFA1316516.E48B776E-ON85257B65.00491DF0-85257B65.0049CDE3@us.ibm.com>
A mangled link at the start of issue-32 discussion > Ted Thibodeau: ISSUE-32.pdf"> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Apr/att-0139/W3C ISSUE-32.pdf ? Unattributed remark (from scribe?) > I see no issues with profile construct same here (pretty sure this was ScribeSteve) > +.5, +.4, +1 (but would like the value to be etag), +0 I also see in the -58 discussion (straw poll at end) some -1's but no information on Why people object. That seems critical to moving the discussion along. Cody, Sergio, EricP, Miel could you share the driving issues behind each of your -1 entries? Arnaud: that last - sharing of -1 reasons - seems like a good norm going forward. Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario From: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org, Date: 05/06/2013 06:44 PM Subject: LDP minutes for May 6 The minutes for today's call are now available for review: https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-05-06 -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 13:26:40 UTC