www-webont-wg@w3.org from June 2002 by date

Monday, 1 July 2002

• ISSUE: Syntax Raphael Volz

Saturday, 29 June 2002

• TEST: Pointer to CLASSIC testsuite Deborah McGuinness
• Re: TEST: scope Jos De_Roo

Sunday, 30 June 2002

• Re: TEST: scope Ian Horrocks

Saturday, 29 June 2002

• Re: TEST: scope Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: TEST: scope Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: TEST: scope Jos De_Roo
• Re: bug in "XML Schema for OWL"? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Abstract syntax document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 28 June 2002

• Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a first-order same-syntax model theory Jos De_Roo
• Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a first-order same-syntax model theory Dan Connolly
• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Jos De_Roo

Thursday, 27 June 2002

• ＊。。連鎖超商邀你加盟。。＊ kk@w3.org
• Re: MISC: fpre-ftf Dan Connolly
• Re: MISC: fpre-ftf Jeff Heflin
• RE: Belated Regrets 6/27 Telecon Thompson, Lynne R
• belated regrets for July 27 larry.eshelman@philips.com
• WOWG: Concerns about "Formal Specification" Document raised on June 27 telecon Jim Hendler
• Re: Updated Requirements Document ready for review Jeff Heflin
• regrets for July 27 Ian Horrocks
• MISC: fpre-ftf Guus Schreiber
• RE: OWL Reference Description for F2F 3 Dan Brickley
• bug in "XML Schema for OWL"? Dan Connolly
• RE: OWL Reference Description for F2F 3 Smith, Michael K
• 7mar requirements draft review: thumbs up, two nits. Dan Connolly
• WOWG: 13Jun minutes: naming issues, document status, ... Dan Connolly
• Abstract syntax document Smith, Michael K
• regrets 2002-06-27 Libby Miller
• ADMIN: Telecon 27 June (Yes, it is on) Jim Hendler
• Re: regrets for 27 June David Trastour
• RE: TEST: scope Jeremy Carroll
• regrets for 27 June Mike Dean

Wednesday, 26 June 2002

• Re: TEST: scope Jim Hendler
• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Jos De_Roo
• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Lynn Andrea Stein
• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Dan Connolly
• Re: TEST: scope Jos De_Roo
• TEST: scope Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 25 June 2002

• Social Event Update to F2F agenda - monday dinner/optional sunday gathering Deborah McGuinness
• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Jos De_Roo
• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) pat hayes
• f2f, regrets Jeremy Carroll
• f2f, regrets Stephen Buswell

Monday, 24 June 2002

• WOWG: OWL in the (online) news Jim Hendler
• small update on f2f, probable regrets for june 27 Deborah McGuinness
• Feature Synopsis for OWL Lite and OWL Deborah McGuinness

Thursday, 20 June 2002

• Re: ADMIN: Minutes of June 20 telecon Jos De_Roo
• Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a first-order same-syntax model theory Jos De_Roo
• belated regrets Leo Obrst
• RE: layering (5.3, 5.10): Sardinia compromise? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ADMIN: Minutes of June 20 telecon larry.eshelman@philips.com
• Re: layering (5.3, 5.10): Sardinia compromise? Jonathan Borden
• RE: layering (5.3, 5.10): Sardinia compromise? Massimo Marchiori
• Re: TEST: complex reasoning test cases? (fwd) Dan Connolly
• Re: TEST: complex reasoning test cases? (fwd) Ian Horrocks
• ISSUE 4.6 EquivalentTo Jeremy Carroll
• Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a first-order same-syntax model theory Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: layering (5.3,5.10): comment on ``reserved vocabulary'' Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a first-order same-syntax model theory Dan Connolly
• Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a first-order same-syntax model theory Jos De_Roo
• regrets for 27 June Enrico Motta
• Face to Face Meeting update Deborah McGuinness

Wednesday, 19 June 2002

• Re: OWL Document list (was Re: proposal for last session of July face-to-face) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a first-order same-syntax model theory Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• OWL Document list (was Re: proposal for last session of July face-to-face) Jim Hendler
• Re: proposal for last session of July face-to-face (new issues?) Jim Hendler
• layering (5.3,5.10): a first-order same-syntax model theory Dan Connolly
• Re: malformed OWL KBs (was Re: proposal for last session of July face-to-face (new issues?)) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: malformed OWL KBs (was Re: proposal for last session of July face-to-face (new issues?)) Dan Connolly
• malformed OWL KBs (was Re: proposal for last session of July face-to-face (new issues?)) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposal for last session of July face-to-face (new issues?) Dan Connolly
• regrets for 27 June Evan Wallace
• Re: XML Schema for OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• [Fwd: XMLP Last Call Heads-Up] Guus Schreiber
• Re: XML Schema for OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• XML Schema for OWL Raphael Volz
• Re: proposal for last session of July face-to-face (new issues?) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposal for last session of July face-to-face (new issues?) Dan Connolly
• proposal for last session of July face-to-face Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Regrets for June 20 Libby Miller
• regrets for 27 June Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Regrets for June 20 Mike Dean
• AGENDA: June 20 telecon Guus Schreiber
• AGENDA: face-to-face Stanford July 1-2 Guus Schreiber

Tuesday, 18 June 2002

• Regrets for 20 June Phonecon Stanton, John
• minutes from the small group webont meeting on june 10 in sardinia Deborah McGuinness
• Regrets for 20 June Jonathan Dale
• Regrets for 2002-06-20 telecon Nick Gibbins
• Re: WOWG: 13Jun agenda: naming issues, document status, ... Dan Connolly
• Regrets for June 20 Smith, Michael K
• Re: WOWG: 13Jun agenda: naming issues, document status, ... Lynn Andrea Stein
• Re: OWL Reference Description for F2F 3 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 17 June 2002

• Re: LANG: new versions of documents available Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Updated Requirements Document ready for review Jeff Heflin
• OWL Reference Description for F2F 3 Mike Dean
• RE: Issues List updated Smith, Michael K
• Re: layering (5.3, 5.10): Sardinia compromise? Jonathan Borden
• RE: layering (5.3, 5.10): Sardinia compromise? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Issues List updated Mike Dean
• Re: layering (5.3, 5.10): Sardinia compromise? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• LANG: new versions of documents available Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: layering (5.3, 5.10): Sardinia compromise? Jonathan Borden
• RE: layering (5.3, 5.10): Sardinia compromise? Massimo Marchiori

Sunday, 16 June 2002

• Issues Doc revised Smith, Michael K
• Admin: meeting agenda in RDF Jim Hendler
• Re: layering (5.3, 5.10): Sardinia compromise? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: layering (5.3, 5.10): Sardinia compromise? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: layering (5.3, 5.10): Sardinia compromise? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: layering (5.3, 5.10): Sardinia compromise? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• 超值雙組合=駭客技術加新名單 sRhGCBYn4c1X9o9f ezgo@w3.org
• Re: layering (5.3, 5.10): Sardinia compromise? Ian Horrocks

Thursday, 13 June 2002

• Face to Face topics Jim Hendler

Friday, 14 June 2002

• Re: Issue 4.1 UniqueProperty is a bad name Jeff Heflin
• Issues List updated Smith, Michael K
• Re: layering (5.3, 5.10): Sardinia compromise? Jonathan Borden
• Re: layering (5.3, 5.10): Sardinia compromise? Jos De_Roo
• Re: TEST: complex reasoning test cases? Ian Horrocks
• layering (5.3, 5.10): Sardinia compromise? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: REVIEW: current version of Feature Synopsis document Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 13 June 2002

• Re: current version of Feature Synopsis document herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: Updated Requirements Document ready for review Bernard Horan
• Re: LANG: inverse/onOf interaction Ian Horrocks
• Re: LANG: inverse/onOf interaction Dan Connolly
• Re: LANG: inverse/onOf interaction Jeff Heflin
• LANG: inverse/onOf interaction Ian Horrocks
• regrets for 6/13 Christopher Welty
• Re: current version of XML presentation syntax files Jonathan Borden
• Re: current version of XML presentation syntax files Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: current version of XML presentation syntax files Jonathan Borden

Wednesday, 12 June 2002

• Re: WOWG: 13Jun agenda: naming issues, document status, ... Jos De_Roo
• WOWG: 13Jun agenda: naming issues, document status, ... Dan Connolly
• Regrets for 12-June Jonathan Dale
• Updated Requirements Document ready for review Jeff Heflin
• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Jos De_Roo
• Re: current version of Feature Synopsis document Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 11 June 2002

• Re: current version of Feature Synopsis document herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• SEM: semantics for the abstract syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 10 June 2002

• Re: REVIEW: current version of Feature Synopsis document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: REVIEW: current version of Feature Synopsis document Jeff Heflin

Sunday, 9 June 2002

• Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 Christopher Welty

Saturday, 8 June 2002

• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Jos De_Roo

Sunday, 9 June 2002

• Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 Jim Hendler

Saturday, 8 June 2002

• EKAW workshop on ontologies for multi-agent systems Valentina Tamma
• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Dan Connolly
• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 Leo Obrst

Friday, 7 June 2002

• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Dan Connolly
• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Dan Connolly
• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Jos De_Roo
• Re: 5.11 hasClass/toClass names Leo Obrst
• Re: REVIEW: current version of Feature Synopsis document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: 5.11 hasClass/toClass names Dan Connolly
• Re: current version of Feature Synopsis document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: current version of Feature Synopsis document herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: 5.11 hasClass/toClass names herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty Libby Miller
• Re: TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (oneOf/sameClassAs) Dan Connolly
• Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty (fwd) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty (fwd) Dan Brickley

Thursday, 6 June 2002

• TEST: Re: notes for 6/6 until 1:10 Jos De_Roo
• notes for 6/6 until 1:10 Christopher Welty
• Re: Issue 4.1 UniqueProperty is a bad name Jos De_Roo
• REVIEW: current version of Feature Synopsis document Jeff Heflin
• Belated Regrets Thompson, Lynne R
• Re: Issue 4.1 UniqueProperty is a bad name Mike Dean
• Re: Issue 4.1 UniqueProperty is a bad name Dan Connolly
• current version of Feature Synopsis document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Review comments about OWL feature synopsis document herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• current version of XML presentation syntax files Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE 3.4: daml:UnambigousProperty Frank van Harmelen
• Issue 4.1 UniqueProperty is a bad name Frank van Harmelen
• Re: 5.11 hasClass/toClass names Frank van Harmelen
• Re: 5.11 hasClass/toClass names Jim Hendler
• regrets 6/6 Jonathan Borden
• WebOnt WG response to RDF Schema Working Draft Nick Gibbins
• Re: 5.11 hasClass/toClass names Ian Horrocks
• Re: Regrets for 6/6 David Trastour
• Re: 5.11 hasClass/toClass names (form now available) Dan Connolly
• Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty Ian Horrocks
• Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty Ian Horrocks
• Re: LOG WebOnt Telcon May 30th (Draft) Dan Connolly
• Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: WOWG ADMIN IMPORTANT: Issue list: cleanup of ISSUES 2.1-3.4 ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com
• Re: pls fill out registration form by 21Jun, even to offer regrets Dan Connolly
• Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty (fwd) Jim Hendler
• Re: TEST: complex reasoning test cases? Dan Connolly
• possible regrets for 6/6 Libby Miller
• Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty (fwd) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty (fwd) Dan Brickley
• Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: WOWG ADMIN IMPORTANT: Issue list: cleanup of ISSUES 2.1-3.4 ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com
• Re: Antwort: Re: WOWG ADMIN IMPORTANT: Issue list: cleanup of ISSUES 2.1-3.4 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty (fwd) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty (fwd) Dan Brickley
• Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty Libby Miller
• Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty Jim Hendler
• RE: Regrets for 6/6 Stephen Buswell
• Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty Ian Horrocks
• Antwort: Re: WOWG ADMIN IMPORTANT: Issue list: cleanup of ISSUES 2.1-3.4 ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com
• TEST: complex reasoning test cases? Ian Horrocks
• REGRETS: June 6 telecon Ziv Hellman
• Re: WOWG ADMIN IMPORTANT: Issue list: cleanup of ISSUES 2.1-3.4 Ian Horrocks
• Re: 4.5 InverseOf: a test case for mapping between ontologies Ian Horrocks

Wednesday, 5 June 2002

• Re: update to the compliance document Mike Dean
• Re: update to the compliance document Jim Hendler
• Re: update to the compliance document Frank van Harmelen
• Re: ADMIN:Agenda - June 6 telecon Jim Hendler
• Regrets for 6/6 Jonathan Dale
• Re: ADMIN:Agenda - June 6 telecon Nick Gibbins
• Review comments about OWL feature synopsis document herman.ter.horst@philips.com

Tuesday, 4 June 2002

• ADMIN:Agenda - June 6 telecon Jim Hendler
• Issue 1.1 Variables -- proposal to close Jim Hendler
• LANG, TEST, GUIDE: Document heads ups Jim Hendler

Monday, 3 June 2002

• MISC: layering OWL on top of something with no definition Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDFCORE: construct for closed lists Jos De_Roo
• Re: 5.11 hasClass/toClass names Guus Schreiber

Tuesday, 28 May 2002

• RE: DTTF: summary (gasp!) Ian Horrocks

Saturday, 1 June 2002

• Re: update to the compliance document Enrico Motta

Last message date: Sunday, 30 June 2002 23:59:23 UTC