- From: Smith, Michael K <michael.smith@eds.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:56:41 -0500
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Based on the last 2 teleconference logs and this weeks meeting. Below is a summary of changes. - Mike Michael K. Smith EDS Austin Innovation Centre 98 San Jacinto, #500 Austin, TX 78701 512 404-6683 ============================================================================ ==== ISSUES FROM : LOG WebOnt Telcon May 30th (Draft) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002May/0287.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Issue 4.5-InverseOf - James Hendler - Apr 19, 2002 - OPEN http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#4.5-InverseOf Proposed resolution by Dan Connoly: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002May/0264.html Ian: Description seems to involve UniquelyIdentifyingProperty often with respect to Datatypes. Proposal is ammended in resolution 5.1 when used with datatypes still open, elsewise close. Closed in favor. Closing text will be online. Resolved. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Issue 5.11-hasClass/ToClass-names - Jim Hendler - 20 May 2002 - OPEN http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#5.11-hasClass/ToClass-na mes People seem have difficulty with those names. asking for more understandable names. No comments on list. Ian: New document does propose completely new names, i.e. toClass (Existential) -> RANGE hasClass --> REQUIRED Example: toClass. all your siblings are people. hasClass. you have a sibling that is a person. Guus: Range might add to the confusion as it is already used otherwise in RDFS. DanC takes nominations for 3 days. Will organize votes. DanC is issue owner. ============================================================================ ==== ISSUES FROM : Notes for 6/6 until 1:10 (Log) <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Jun/0055.html">M inutes</a> <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Jun/0079.html">C orrections</a> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Issue 1.1 Variables Issue: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#1.1-Variables Proposal to close. Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Jun/0006.html Resolution: closed issue. None opposed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Issue 2.1 URI naming of instances Issue: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#2.1-URI-naming-of-instan ces Proposal to close Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002May/0255.html Status: No comments raised on mailing list Discussion: DanC thinks this is related to pointing to parts of an XML Schema element. PFPS is "not unhappy" with the proposal. JeffH asked if an update to requirements doc is needed, the answer seemed to be "no." (JeffH undoubtedly "not unhappy" about that) Resolution: closed issue. None opposed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Issue 2.3 Adding Properties to Other Classes Issue: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#2.3-Adding-Properties-to -Other-Classes Proposal to close. Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002May/0256.html Status: Wording changes proposed by Jeff Heflin in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002May/0268.html New Proposal: CLOSE with amended wording (per Jeff msg): Our Working group has decided to use RDF/XML as our exchange framework and that the semantics of our documents will be carried by the triple store corresponding to this document (see resolutions of second face to face meeting). The basic RDF model [1] allows documents to refer to and extend the resources defined in other documents. Discussion: DanC wanted a test case, for each feature there should be one. Resolution: Closed issue. None opposed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Issue 2.4 - Enumerated Classes (daml:oneOf) Issue: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#2.4-Enumerated-Classes Proposal to close Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002May/0257.html Status: No discussion on WG. Discussion: DanC opposed to closing issue. Ian expressed "no opinion" on closing the issue, merely posted some information (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Jun/0016.html). Ian will send a an example of what he meant for the benefit of smaller-brained mammals. Dan will reconsider a test case posted by Jos. Resolution: None. Issue still open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Issue 3.1 - Local Restrictions Issue: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#3.1-Local-Restrictions Proposal to close proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002May/0259.html status: No discussion on mailing list. Discussion: DanC says this is necessary to meet the cardinality requirement. Resultion: closed. None opposed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Issue 3.3 (Daml:DisjointFrom) from issues list Issue: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#3.3-DisjointFrom Proposal to eradicate Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002May/0261.html Status: Mike Dean has suggested a change, and closing text in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002May/0262.html New proposal: CLOSE with Mike Dean's wording Discussion: DanC wants a test case for all features. PFPS doesn't think absence of test cases should interfere with closing an issue. DanC disagrees, but not strongly enough to do the test case. Resolution: closed. None opposed (strongly enough). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Issue 3.4 daml:UnambiguousProperty Issue: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#3.4-UnambiguousProperty Proposal to close Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002May/0260.html Status: DanC points out a missed fact: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002May/0272.html New proposal: CLOSE with amended wording: daml:UnambiguousProperty is motivated by the "cardinality constraints" requirement in http://www.w3.org/TR/webont-req/#section-requirements. No one has advocated its removal and there does seem to be consensus it is a desirable feature. It is provided for in DAML+OIL and will be provided in OWL. Discussion: DanC thinks related to the cardinality requirement. Needs to be renamed. FrankvH offered to raise the renaming as a new issue. DanC believed more expedient to add renaming as part of the issue. Resolution: Issue left open. FrankvH to own issue and add a discussion of renaming. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Issue 4.8 Trust and Ontology Issue: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#4.8-Trust-and-Ontology Proposal to POSTPONE Proposal: This issue was raised by a comment to public-webont-comments: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2002Apr/0005.html The issue is an important one, but beyond the scope of this WG. Someone should take the ACTION to write this up for the issues document. Discussion: Issue needs an owner. Jim responded to the outside poster citing wording in the requirements document that this is important, but outside our scope. DanC was happy with this. What trust means was discussed briefly. Most agreed it was out of scope. Evan and Laurent objected initially to closing the issue. Evan thought there are some important issues regarding trust we should allow in the language. JimH said that the languages allows for "tags it doesn't understand" and that groups of users can agree amongst themselves to use certain tags to represent trust, since RDF lets us refer to expressions themselves and say things about them. Laurent raised, I believe, the idea of confidence values as a part of the language. Jim seemed to convince him that "saying things about ontologies" was enough, or that more was outside our scope. Resolution: Closed issue. JimH will own it. None opposed. ============================================================================ ==== ISSUES FROM : Agenda, June 13 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Jun/0088.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Issue 4.5 Inverse resolved 30May (see above) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002May/0287.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----I Issue 5.11 ISSUE hasClass/ToClass-names (see above) OPEN, with DanC is issue owner, 30May ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- 4.8 Trust and Ontology resolved 6Jun. (see above)
Received on Friday, 14 June 2002 13:56:51 UTC