- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 22:49:23 +0200
- To: "Dan Connolly <connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen" <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>, "www-webont-wg" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
[...] > Other candidates I've heard of, in case anybody finds them > preferable... > > <ont:FunctionalProperty rdf:about="#father"/> > <ont:ManyToOne rdf:about="#father"/> > > By the way... is there a separate issue for UnambiguousProperty > being a bad name? What would be the analog of HasOnlyOne? > > Analogs of the above two: > > <ont:FunctionalProperty rdf:about="#father"/> > <ont:Injective rdf:about="#personalMailbox"/> > > (i.e. if ?x personalMailbox ?z > and ?y personalMailbox ?z then ?x=?y) > > > <ont:ManyToOne rdf:about="#father"/> > <ont:OneToMany rdf:about="#personalMailbox"/> > > I think I prefer ManyToOne and OneToMany. I prefer those as well -- Jos
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2002 16:50:01 UTC