Re: REVIEW: current version of Feature Synopsis document

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 12:35:46 -0400
• To: heflin@cse.lehigh.edu
• Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20020610123546X.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
Subject: Re: REVIEW: current version of Feature Synopsis document
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 11:05:25 -0400

[....]

> > > 5) Section 4: If <fact> ::= <individualFact> then why even have this
> > > production? It has no impact on the syntax.
> > 
> > Not true.  There are other options for <fact>.
> 
> Oh, I see the last two productions at the end of the section now. Still,
> this seems like an unusual use of BNF, and I imagine is likely to
> confuse others as well. Maybe a brief comment can preemt such confusion.



The introduction has a section that deals with the way EBNF is used in this
document.

Peter

(more later)

Received on Monday, 10 June 2002 12:35:58 UTC