- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 23:14:43 -0400
- To: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
one quick comment from: > http://www-db.research.bell-labs.com/user/pfps/owl/schema-example.xml [[ <!-- range="xsd:integer" ? --> <owl:DataType rdf:ID="xsd:integer" /> ]] if rdf:ID is to be used, the value should be an xml:NCName (or xsd:ID) not a QName... of course if you want to use QNames here then don't use "rdf:ID" rather you can define "owl:ID" as you please. In general I am squeamish about reusing any namespace qualified name for an attribute or element in a grammar not intended for by its namespace. Think of QNames as a way to find documentation about an element or attribute -- the namespace name URI ought point to some document from which the attribute or element name may be documented... in this case the lone rdf:ID is a fish out of water. Jonathan
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2002 23:28:19 UTC