- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:06:33 -0400
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> Subject: Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a first-order same-syntax model theory Date: 20 Jun 2002 10:55:17 -0500 > On Wed, 2002-06-19 at 17:21, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > Good. A proposal. > > thanks for the quick feedback... > > > > > From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> > > Subject: layering (5.3,5.10): a first-order same-syntax model theory > > Date: 19 Jun 2002 16:26:58 -0500 > > > > [...] > > > > > Additionally, owl reserves the following vocabulary: > > > > [...] > > > > I have no idea what ``reserves the ... vocabulary'' could mean. > > basically, it means that these symbols denote something > in every OWL interpretation. > > I guess the allusion to [RDFMT] wasn't sufficiently explicit... > > "An interpretation assigns meanings to symbols in a particular > vocabulary of urirefs. Some interpretations may assign special meanings > to the symbols in a particular namespace, which we will call a reserved > vocabulary." > > -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-mt-20020429/#urisandlit Hmm. I suggest (to Pat) that he change this. ``Reserved vocabulary'' usually means syntactically reserved. However, I don't know of a replacement phrase for this. peter
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2002 12:06:45 UTC