- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 18:27:26 -0400
- To: hendler@cs.umd.edu
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu> Subject: OWL Document list (was Re: proposal for last session of July face-to-face) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 17:41:03 -0400 > At 10:05 AM -0400 6/19/02, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: [...] > >My proposal is that this session should be mostly devoted to planning with > >respect to finishing the definition of OWL. The documents currently being > >developed in the working group do not form a complete definition of OWL and > >the missing sections need to be filled in very soon. > > > >I am thus providing a proposal for filling in these missing sections. [...] > Not to comment on the above, but I think you leave a few things out > in the "completion" of OWL - let's not forget > 1) Required*: Guide and walkthru documents > 2) Required*: Test cases and implementations (needed for Last Call) > 3) Optional**: Any other non-normative syntaxes other people wish to publish > 4) Optional***: Axiomatic Semantics (in KIF or other format) > > *: min-cardinality = 1 > **: no cardinality specification > ***: max-cardinality = 1 > > > -- > Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Not to comment on the desirability of completing the work needed to get to Rec status, but are any of these needed to ```[finish] the definition of OWL''? Besides, both GUIDE and TEST have sessions devoted to them in the F2F. peter
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2002 18:27:42 UTC