Datatyped literals, another "test case"
Untyped literals/datatyping: another test case
Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 1)
- Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 1)
- Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 1)
test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML?
- Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML?
- Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML?
- Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML?
clarify "inline literals"
new postponed issue #rdf-embedded
Re: possible semantic bugs concerning domain and range
Redesigning CC/PP for tidy literals
apologies
2002-09-27 telecon minutes
results of untidy experiment
Regrets for _next_ week's telecon (2002-10-04)
datatype property in the statement object pair
- Re: datatype property in the statement object pair
- Re: datatype property in the statement object pair
possible partial regrets
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-09-27
Fw: Datatyping
Reopening tidy/untidy decision
- Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision
- Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision
- Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision
- Proposal for Deferrment and Closure (was Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision)
Fwd: Re: Intentions of XMP
Re: Intentions of XMP
- Re: Intentions of XMP
- Re: Intentions of XMP
- Re: Intentions of XMP
- why I object (was: Intentions of XMP)
- Re: Intentions of XMP
Weekly call for agenda items
Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks
- Re: Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks
- Re: Tidy/untidy: that's all about assumptions, folks
Some excerpts from AdobeXMP SDK Documentation
Minutes: 2002-09-20 (retry)
Tidy vs untidy literals: 2 test cases motivated by CC/PP
The case for untidy literal semantics
- Re: The case for untidy literal semantics
- Re: The case for untidy literal semantics
- Re: The case for untidy literal semantics
Minutes: 2002-09-20
- Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20
- Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20
- Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20
- Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20, ACTION 2002-09-20#2 ("assertion")
- Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20
- Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20
- Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20
- Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20
On Consensus
- RE: On Consensus
- Re: On Consensus
- Re: On Consensus
- Re: On Consensus
syntax and semantics
DECIDED: untidy semantics
- Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics
- RE: DECIDED: untidy semantics
- Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics
- Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics
- Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics
- Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics
- Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics
- Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics
- Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics
- Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics
- RE: DECIDED: untidy semantics
Abstract data model update - discussion
Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals
- datatype explanations questions
- Re: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals
- RE: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals
- Re: Proposed N-Triples changes for datatypes & (untidy) literals
xml:lang and XML infoset: two new datatypes
possible regrets for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-09-20
Fwd: Proposed LC review of SOAP Attachment Feature doc
- Re: Fwd: Proposed LC review of SOAP Attachment Feature doc
- Re: Fwd: Proposed LC review of SOAP Attachment Feature doc
Gentile utente Telecom italia
RDF lists
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-09-20
Minutes of telecon 2002-09-13
Re: Erratum to XML 1.0 spec to allow xml:lang=""
An observation about rdf:Seq
Fwd: Erratum to XML 1.0 spec to allow xml:lang=""
Technical change to the RDFS MT
- RE: Technical change to the RDFS MT
- Re: Technical change to the RDFS MT
- RE: Technical change to the RDFS MT (test cases in n3)
weekly call for agenda items
Issue #rdf-containers-otherapproaches
Issue: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty
Re: daml:collection is just Literal test: need help with details [was: current action list]
Re: WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-05-31
Arguments for Value-Based Inline Literal Semantics
Kudos to the primer editors and contributors
RDF concepts -- editors' issue list
decision time: semantics of non-datatyped literals
- RE: decision time: semantics of non-datatyped literals
- Re: decision time: semantics of non-datatyped literals
Discussing tidiness of untyped RDF literals
Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model.
- Re: Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model.
- RE: Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model.
- Re: Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model.
- Re: Datatypes, abstract syntax / data model.
aob for the telecon fwd: Technical Plenary Logistics -- please reply by 30 September
abstract syntax representation of inline literals
- Re: abstract syntax representation of inline literals
- Re: abstract syntax representation of inline literals
- Re: abstract syntax representation of inline literals
- Re: abstract syntax representation of inline literals
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-09-13
RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items)
- Re: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items)
- RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items)
2002-09-06#5 Datatype actions
New I-D Up
weekly call for agenda items
- Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items)
- RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items)
- RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items)
- Re: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items)
- RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items)
- RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items)
In recognition of the efforts of PatH, Sergey and PatS on datatypes
Datatyping, reification, syntactic tidyness
Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case
- Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case
Comments on new datatyping document, part 1
- Re: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1
- Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1)
- Re: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1)
- RE: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1)
- Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1)
- Re: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1
faq-html-compliance is closed
Re: Draft minutes: telecon 2002-09-06 (namespace last call)
Untyped Literal Semantics
in line literal semantics
- Re: in line literal semantics
- Re: in line literal semantics
- Re: in line literal semantics (and some thoughts on CC/PP)
Re: RDF Datatyping PART 1 [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002 -08-30]
Regrets for 2002-08-13 telecon
Draft minutes: telecon 2002-09-06
Re: RDF Datatyping PART 1 [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002 -08-30]
Fwd: Helpers for specification editors
handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags
- Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags
- Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags
- Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags
- Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags
- Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags
- Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags
- Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags
- Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags
- Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags
- Re: handling bare literals and PS a Q. about lang tags
rdf(s):Literal and stuff like that
RDF Datatyping PART 1 [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-30]
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-30
Distributing Datatypes Part 1 amongst the other docs
Fwd: to eds: document technologies survey
Fwd: Last call announcement for Namespaces 1.1
- Re: Fwd: Last call announcement for Namespaces 1.1
- Re: Fwd: Last call announcement for Namespaces 1.1
RE: Comments on datatyping draft
Re: xsi:type not specializable [was: datatypes status
RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit"
RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit"
Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec
- Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec
- Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec
2002-08-23#6 Ensure that WG home page points to current editor working drafts
- Re: 2002-08-23#6 Ensure that WG home page points to current editor working drafts
- Re: 2002-08-23#6 Ensure that WG home page points to current editor working drafts
RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit"
- RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit"
- RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit"
Re: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit"
Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit"
Document structure
XML Base - should be used
RE: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals
- RE: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals
- RE: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals
Re: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals
- Re: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals
- Re: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals
Minutes of RDF Core WG telcon, 2002-08-30
Datatyping, rdf?:Datatype unnecessary
Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate
- RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate
- RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate
- RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate
- RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate
- RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate
- RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate
- RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate
- RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate
- Re: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate
- RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate
- RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate