RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate from Jan Grant on 2002-09-03 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from September 2002)

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 12:45:01 +0100 (BST)
To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
cc: "dave.beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0209031243420.1459-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:

>    rdfs:Datatype     The class of RDF compliant datatypes

Hang on a tick, I'm still not sure what the relation between
rdf[s?]:Literal and rdf[s?]:Datatype is. If _all_ literals are typed,
then can you explain why Datatype is different from Literal again?

Cheers,
jan

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
It's a sad fact that the word "semantics" seems to have lost all meaning.

Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 07:48:15 UTC