- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:48:37 +0100
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 14:14 11/09/2002 +0200, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > > > > >And I buy Guha's point at the Bristol F2F that with untidy > > literal semantics > > >rdf:object refers to the syntax of the triple not its semantics. > > > > That is reopening an old issue where I believe we have already > > decided the > > value of the reification properties do not denote the syntax. > > > > Are you suggesting this treatment be special for rdf:object? > > Just when it > > takes a literal value? > >No, I think you have misunderstood. I am not reopening any issues. Forgive me for not being clear. Given your statement: [[ rdf:object refers to the syntax of the triple not its semantics. ]] Given: <rdf:Description rdf:bagID="bar" rdf:about="http://example.org/foo"> <eg:foobar rdf:resource="http://example.org/bar"/> </rdf:Description> are you suggesting that equivalent triples include _:stmt <rdf:object> "http://example.org/bar" . Brian
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2002 08:50:59 UTC