Re: On Consensus from Jeremy Carroll on 2002-09-25 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from September 2002)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:33:56 +0200
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200209250933.56262.jjc@hpl.hp.com>

(there is a typo in my last message)

[[[
It is difficult to justify why the bitsPerPixel "8" should (without the schema 
information) be viewed as unequal from the eg:name "8".

After we have read the schema, even the one with the comment and no range 
constraint; it seems that an RDF application would be justified in storing 
the bitsPerPixel as an int, and finding that it was equal to the eg:age and 
different from the 
]]

**bitsPerPixel** (wrong)

eg:name (was what I meant)

Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2002 03:35:57 UTC