- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:59:20 +0200
- To: "pat hayes <phayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>>Pat, I think I'm fine with that >> >>how can we express that >>when given >> _:l1 rdf:first :a . >> _:l1 rdf:rest :b . >> >> _:l2 rdf:first :a . >> _:l2 rdf:rest :b . >> >>then _:l1 and _:l2 are tidy > >Er...you can't. That is, there could be two lists with the same members. thus far I thought that 2 sequences with the same members *are* the same sequence (i.e. the denoted thing is the same) how could they ever be different, I mean semantically? -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 20 September 2002 11:00:00 UTC