Re: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) from Jan Grant on 2002-09-13 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from September 2002)

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 09:22:19 +0100 (BST)
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
cc: ext Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0209130921120.14461-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Patrick Stickler wrote:

> We really need to be careful to keep separate the abstract graph
> from the application specific representation, which I feel is
> getting all mixed up here.
>
> ASSERTION:  The abstract graph should capture the statements made
>             in the RDF/XML, in the original language of those
>             statements.

I'd love to know what "original anguage" means, because it seems to me
on a first glance (my reading, anyway) that this assertion is probably
false.


-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
Semantic rules, OK?

Received on Friday, 13 September 2002 04:24:18 UTC