- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 15:49:50 +0300
- To: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Cc: <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Jos De_Roo [mailto:jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com] > Sent: 02 September, 2002 15:44 > To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere) > Cc: Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk; w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > Subject: RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate > > > [...] > > > > (although I still think that it's better > > > to have only primitive datatypes and describe > > > the composed ones directly in RDF) > > > > I'm not sure I follow you. Examples? > > (inspiration from http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/) > > _:a rdf:type eg:UKAddress . > > _:a eg:exportCode int"1" . > _:a eg:name "Helen Zoe" . > _:a eg:street "47 Eden Street" . > _:a eg:city "Cambridge" . > _:a eg:postcode "CB1 1JR" . > > -- , > Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ Right. Typed XML literals are now excluded from the core proposal captured by part 1 of the latest specification. Patrick
Received on Monday, 2 September 2002 08:49:54 UTC