new postponed issue #rdf-embedded

Tim has suggested a new issue in

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Sep/0168.html

which I have recorded under the postponed list:

as:

[[When RDF is embedded in another document, it is the enclosing document 
which determines whether the RDF statements are asserted.  How should it 
indicate this to an RDF processor?]]

We do, from time to time get new issues like this, which do not arise from 
changes this WG has made.  I think the time has come to close the issue 
list to such issues.  With the WG's permission I will put such new issues 
immediately into the postponed list without further discussion.  I will 
email the WG of the new issue so that anyone concerned that it needs to be 
dealt with sooner has the opportunity to say so.  I will inform the issue 
raiser that the issue is on the postponed list.

Please let me know if there any concerns about this method of handling new 
issues.

Brian

Received on Saturday, 28 September 2002 07:53:36 UTC