- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:16:56 +0100 (BST)
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Brian McBride wrote: > > At 16:22 26/09/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote: > [...] > > > > > > > I suggested in: > > > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0284.html > > > > > > [[model.contains(c, d, a.getProperty(b).getObject())]] > > > > > > was an accurate representation of the entailment. Would you accept that? > > > >I would accept it as *one* possible string-based interpretation > >of inline literals expressed using the Jena API, but not any > >fixed string-based interpretation mandated nor even suggested by > >the Jena API. > > The question was: > > Is the above expression an accurate representation of the entailment in > the jena API? The answer to that appears to be "yes". > I think that is a question which deserved a yes/no answer. If you answer > yes, then we can look for an equivalent in XMP. I am not sure what your > answer means. > > Also you haven't responded to my difficulty in understanding what > consistent test you are applying to reach your conclusions. > > I doesn't seem like this discussion is making progress. Time to end it > perhaps. > > Brian > > > > -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ "My army boots contain everything not in them." - Russell's pair o' Docs.
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 11:17:34 UTC