- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:32:02 +0300
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, "ext Eric Miller" <em@w3.org>, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com] ----- Original Message ----- From: "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>; <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>; "ext Eric Miller" <em@w3.org> Sent: 27 September, 2002 10:21 Subject: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision > At 22:21 26/09/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote: > > > >I ask that the proponents of string-based (tidy) semantics > >present their arguments to the WG in the same manner > >as the proponents of value-based (untidy) semantics were > >asked to do prior ro last Friday's vote. > > That seems sensible. I suggest we collect all the reasons for and against > each proposal into the rationale document we started this week. Would that > be acceptable Patrick? Yes. I think so. Patrick
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 04:32:15 UTC