- From: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 17:15:33 +0200
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I'm suggesting to treat strings with xml:lang specifiers as a new datatype (call it "language-tagged string"), disjoint with xsd:string. Similarly, XML infosets should simply be yet another datatype, disjoint with any other XSD datatype. These two datatypes were essentially defined as such in the original RDF spec. Now that we have a general-purpose datatyping mechanism, we can make use of it. The two datatypes should get their own URIs. If there is enough support for that, I'd like to put the above point for vote at the next telecon. The current proposal for representing typed values in the abstract syntax (URI + string) fails for the above datatypes. Therefore, I'm also suggesting that this overspecification is not required. In the abstract syntax, typed literals may be kept as opaque constants, whereas the applications may use their internal representation of choice. Sergey
Received on Friday, 20 September 2002 11:19:19 UTC