Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision

At 22:21 26/09/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote:


>I ask that the proponents of string-based (tidy) semantics
>present their arguments to the WG in the same manner
>as the proponents of value-based (untidy) semantics were
>asked to do prior ro last Friday's vote.

That seems sensible.  I suggest we collect all the reasons for and against 
each proposal into the rationale document we started this week.  Would that 
be acceptable Patrick?

Brian

Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 03:39:05 UTC