- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 08:21:18 +0100
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, "ext Eric Miller" <em@w3.org>
At 22:21 26/09/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote: >I ask that the proponents of string-based (tidy) semantics >present their arguments to the WG in the same manner >as the proponents of value-based (untidy) semantics were >asked to do prior ro last Friday's vote. That seems sensible. I suggest we collect all the reasons for and against each proposal into the rationale document we started this week. Would that be acceptable Patrick? Brian
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 03:39:05 UTC