- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 11:30:58 +0100
- To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
With reference to: 2002-09-06#5 bwm as series editor: solicit aid from DT document editors in assigning parts of the document to other doc editors. We already have: 2002-09-06#2 daveb add the rdf:datatype productions to the syntax document 2002-09-06#4 jjc review material thus far on specifics of rdfs:Datatype, rdfs:Literal and the abstract syntax of literals and produce a proposal for wording in the Abs. Syntax document. Reviewing http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Aug/0111.html With apologies to the doc editors if they feel this is micromanaging, I suggest that broadly: 1.1 What is datatyping -> concepts 1.2 desiderata -> concepts 2.2 2.1 rdfs:Datatype -> schema 2.2 datatype mapping -> concepts 2.3 type literal -> concepts 3. designation of ... -> syntax 3.1 global datatyping -> schema 3.2 datatype clashes -> schema 4. model theory -> ho hum, lets put that in test cases. ok maybe not. MT doc then. 5. schema -> schema 6.1 not sure 6.2 examples -> primer + other docs at editors discretion Also needed: n-triples representation test cases This suggests further actions: Graham or Jeremy update concepts doc to cover 1.1, 1.2, 2.2, 2.3 Danbri or Guha update schema to cover 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 5 Pat update model theory to cover 4 DaveB update n-triples (depends on completion of 2002-09-06#4) ?? prepare datatypes test cases Brian
Received on Thursday, 12 September 2002 06:33:25 UTC