- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 08:44:00 +0300
- To: <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
The datatyping spec already does. ;-) Patrick > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hpl.hp.com] > Sent: 02 September, 2002 16:27 > To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > Subject: XML Base - should be used > > > > > I would like to suggest that: > - any test cases with relative URIs should use XML Base > - any examples in any of our documents that use relative URIs > should use XML > Base > - that the syntax and primer documents should suggest that > the use of XML Base > is preferred. > > Note: rdf:ID introduces relative URIs. > > The sort of use that I envisage is that where a document on > the web includes > an xml:base declaration which gives the documents usual base URL. > > Not including such base uris makes teh document ambiguous. > > For example if I GET > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-not-id-and-r > esource-attr/test001.rdf > > then the triples that I find are those in > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-not-id-and-r esource-attr/test001.nt However, if I get http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test001 then I get different triples, and these are not the ones in any nt file in the test area. Similarly I might get HTTP://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test001.rdf or http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-not-id-and-resource-%61ttr/test001.rdf and get different results. (Sorry to raise this so late; I have only recently noticed this) Jeremy http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 01:44:03 UTC