- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:00:56 +0100
- To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Action Summary: ACTION: 2002-09-13#1 jjc will send comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0068.html re namespace last call to appropriate group ACTION: 2002-09-13#2 Graham to update concepts doc to cover 1.1, 1.2, 2.2, 2.3 to reflect datatype concensus ACTION: 2002-09-13#3 Danbri to update schema to cover 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 5 to reflect datatype concensus ACTION: 2002-09-13#4 PatH to update model theory to cover 4 to reflect datatype concensus ACTION: 2002-09-13#5 FrankM to update primer to reflect datatype concensus ACTION: 2002-09-13#6 Jan to create testcase to reflect datatype concensus ACTION: 2002-09-13#7 Bwm to contact DaveB and request update n-triples (depends on completion of 2002-09-06#4) to reflect datatype concensus ACTION: 2002-09-13#8 jjc update the abstract data model in concepts doc to reflect the pair denoting a datatype literal ACTION: 2002-09-13#9 bwm to request space at the tech plenary for RDF meeting Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0137.html 1: Scribes This weeks volunteer scribe is Eric Miller Jjc volunteers to scribe next week. 2: Roll Call Bwm, Manola, SteveP, JosD Jjc, AaronSw, EricM, PatrickS, Mike_Dean, Pat_Hayes, JanG, Danbri Joined Later: Sergey, MikeD, GrahamK 3: Review Agenda 4: Next telecon 20th Sept 2002 5: Minutes of 2002-09-06 telecon See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0081.html Minutes Approved. 6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions ACTION: 2002-05-17#1 DaveB Investigate issue faq-html-compliance and propose a resolution see: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#faq-html-compliance ACTION: 2002-08-30#1 AaronSw Publish new MIME Type Internet Draft. see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0122.html ACTION: 2002-09-06#3 bwm ensure credit for DT document contents is not lost see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0120.html ACTION: 2002-09-06#5 bwm as series editor: solicit aid from DT document editors in assigning parts of the document to other doc editors. see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0125.html Actions Approved. 7: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions ACTION: 2002-05-17#3 jjc Propose new text to describe serialization of b-nodes. Not withdrawn. jjc needs to check with DaveB whether this is still needed. 8: Review of namespaces last call Propose approve Jeremy's comments as in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0068.html [[[ Our comments on the first working draft have been more than adequately addressed. The namespaces 1.1 Last Call draft is compatible with the use of XML Namespaces by RDF. In fact, we intend to copy your section 7, on IRIs verbatim, unless you get to Rec before we get to last call. ]]] Comments approved. ACTION: 2002-09-13#1 jjc, will send comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0068.html re namespace last call to appropriate group See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0058.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0068.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0091.html 9: Datatypes Discuss proposed actions for splitting up datatypes doc See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0257.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0125.html Proposal approved. ACTION: 2002-09-13#2 Graham to update concepts doc to cover 1.1, 1.2, 2.2, 2.3 to reflect datatype concensus ACTION: 2002-09-13#3 Danbri to update schema to cover 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 5 to reflect datatype concensus ACTION: 2002-09-13#4 PatH to update model theory to cover 4 to reflect datatype concensus ACTION: 2002-09-13#5 FrankM to update primer to reflect datatype concensus ACTION: 2002-09-13#6 Jan to create testcase to reflect datatype concensus ACTION: 2002-09-13#7 Bwm to contact DaveB and request update n-triples (depends on completion of 2002-09-06#4) to reflect datatype concensus 10: Recognition for datatypes editors Discuss proposal in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0120.html Approved. 11: Abstract Syntax for Literals Discuss proposals. The WG decided the abstract syntax should represent a datatyped literal as a pair of a datatype URI and a lexical form. ACTION: 2002-09-13#8 jjc update the abstract data model in concepts doc to reflect the pair denoting a datatype literal See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0123.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0127.html 12: Tidyness of untyped Literals Deferred to after hours discussion. AOB: Should we request space for a face to face meeting for RDFCore at the next tech plenary. Whilst it is not clear what the meeting will be used for, discussing RDF futures being a possibility, the WG decided to request space for a meeting. ACTION: 2002-09-13#9 bwm to request space at the tech plenary for RDF meeting 13: Frank's new assertion text 2002-08-23#7 FrankM Propose alternative text for the concepts and abstract model document to rectify concerns with conflicting use of "assertion". Skipped. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0226.html http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/2002-08-05/Overview.htm#section-Social
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2002 08:03:22 UTC