- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 13:18:27 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 04:16 PM 8/30/02 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: >... xsi:type makes sense (to me) >as part of the syntax of a literal; it doesn't >make sense (to me) as a subPropertyOf rdf:type; >we don't want parsers to have to theorem-proving >to distinguish one literal for another. >That's sorta the point of literals: you can see, >just by looking, whether they denote the same >thing or not. I agree with Dan on this. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2002 08:49:56 UTC