Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-30

Time:
10:00:00 Fri Sep 06 2002 in America/New York

which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Sep 06 2002 in Europe/London

Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore

1: Scribes
This weeks volunteer scribe is Jan Grant
Volunteer to scribe next week


2: Roll Call


3: Review Agenda


4: Next telecon 13th Sept 2002


5: Minutes of 2002-08-30 telecon with correction

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0008.html


6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions

ACTION: 2002-08-16#3 EricM
publish rdf concepts and abstract data model WD

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0067.html

see:
  http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/

ACTION: 2002-08-23#2 DaveB
initiate dialog with DC community about the issue of rdf:Alt usage.

ACTION: 2002-08-23#3 JanG
review current datatypes document.

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0265.html

ACTION: 2002-08-23#4 SteveP
review current datatypes document.

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0265.html

ACTION: 2002-08-30#3 Jan
Write a proposal to change the form of literals.

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0021.html



7: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions

ACTION: 2002-08-30#2 Brian
Add an issue of the attribute used to identify datatype literals

ACTION: 2002-08-30#4 Brian
Try to enter the conversation on dc-architecture.



8: Status of new mime types draft
2002-08-30#1  AaronSw  Publish new MIME Type Internet Draft


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0221.html


9: Review of namespaces last call
Volunteers to review this doc on behalf of the WG.  


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0058.html


10: Datatypes

Discuss part 1 of Patrick's consensus building document 

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0257.html

along with changes proposed in

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0040.html  

Some folks have expressed enthusiasm that this document broadly captures
a consensus on which the WG can move forward.  The chair would like to hear
this also from the rest of the WG.

Consider whether, in the light of this new approach to datatypes the contents
of part 1 should be distributed amongst the other docs.

Time permitting (perhaps after hours)

The abstract syntax of literals.



See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0233.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0257.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0040.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0061.html


11: Relationship between XML Schema and RDF
Specifically, suggestion to ignore attributes from the xml:schema
namespace to allow processing by both xml schema processors and rdf
processors.
             

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0165.html


12: Frank's new assertion text
2002-08-23#7  FrankM  Propose alternative text for the concepts and abstract
                 model document to rectify concerns with conflicting use of 
                 "assertion".


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0226.html
  http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/2002-08-05/Overview.htm#section-Social



------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant

Received on Thursday, 5 September 2002 13:22:20 UTC