- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:22:50 +0300
- To: "ext Jan Grant" <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
OK, Mom ;-) (but he started it... ;-) -- Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 50) 483 9453, patrick.stickler@nokia.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>; "ext Jan Grant" <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk> Cc: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org> Sent: 05 September, 2002 13:32 Subject: Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec > At 13:15 05/09/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote: > > [...] > > >Of course, that presumes we *are* modelling them as contextual > >names, which of course is the crux of the whole untidy/tidy debate, > >whether inline literals are global names or contextual names... > > > Please can we focus on getting the part 1 datatypes stuff moving forward > and come back to tidyness issues later. I'm hoping to keep part 1 moving > rapidly and am concerned about it getting distracted by a return to the > tidy/untidy debate. > > Mother henish'ly > Brian >
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2002 07:23:17 UTC