- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 15:26:54 +0200
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
I would like to suggest that: - any test cases with relative URIs should use XML Base - any examples in any of our documents that use relative URIs should use XML Base - that the syntax and primer documents should suggest that the use of XML Base is preferred. Note: rdf:ID introduces relative URIs. The sort of use that I envisage is that where a document on the web includes an xml:base declaration which gives the documents usual base URL. Not including such base uris makes teh document ambiguous. For example if I GET http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test001.rdf then the triples that I find are those in http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test001.nt However, if I get http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test001 then I get different triples, and these are not the ones in any nt file in the test area. Similarly I might get HTTP://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test001.rdf or http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-not-id-and-resource-%61ttr/test001.rdf and get different results. (Sorry to raise this so late; I have only recently noticed this) Jeremy http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf
Received on Monday, 2 September 2002 09:28:29 UTC