- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 11:30:16 +0100
- To: "Patrick.Stickler" <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>"Patrick.Stickler" said: > > Please just pick your favourite name to use in rdf: ... > >=20 > > I'd also suggest that rdfs:Datatype was better,=20 > > How about > > rdf:datatype Specifies an rdfs:Datatype > > rdfs:Datatype The class of RDF compliant datatypes > > ??? > > If rdf:datatype gives you indigestion, then I think > that rdf:dtype is the next best. Both are fine. I can see user problems with the d and D confusion though. Dave
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 06:33:16 UTC