- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:59:34 +0100
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>>>Patrick Stickler said: > Jenny ex:age (_:y, "10") . > _:y rdf:type rdf:Datatype . > ]] > > The above isn't representable in RDF/XML (with datatypes attribute) > unless we add another one: rdf:datatypeNodeID > > See part 2 of the resructured document. Which document? I had to look at the zip file attached to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Aug/0100.html then the one attached to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Aug/0111.html ----- Aside: I'd prefer not attaching a zip of files, it means you can't point at the documents on the web - they have no URI-refs :) ---- After extracting neither seems to have anything relevant in part 2 (2.1, 2.2, 2.3). If you think Jenny ex:age (_:y, "10") . _:y rdf:type rdf:Datatype . can be represented in RDF/XML (with rdf:datatype attribute), please include it your email reply. The crucial point is that rdf:datatype takes uri-refs, not bnodes, so the bnode given to the "10" literal cannot be assigned by the creator of the rdf/xml and hence is unknown to the creator. Dave
Received on Friday, 6 September 2002 09:02:54 UTC