- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 21:45:11 +0200
- To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>My understanding of the tidy position is that this mapping is made by the >>application at its own initiative, and it is unlicensed, or licensed only by >>private channel. > >The way I tend to think of the tidy position on this is that the mapping is >defined in the definition of the property. Its not that its necessarily >private or unlicensed but it is unavailable to a generic RDF processor. As >an example, the cc/pp bitsPerPixel property could be defined to be: > > A string which is the decimal representation of the integer number of >bits per pixel how is that possible, I was exactly thinking the same but that is indeed buitltin interpretation -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2002 15:45:49 UTC