- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:34:34 +0200
- To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- Cc: Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
[...]
> 2. That those who think rdf:type should not be used, try
> suggesting a better alternative (other than xsi:type).
I don't know, but couldn't it be something like
... rdf:Parsetype="Literal">
<xsd:integer>10</xsd:integer>
...
(although I still think that it's better
to have only primitive datatypes and describe
the composed ones directly in RDF)
-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Monday, 2 September 2002 06:35:19 UTC