Re: Explanation? of difference between Patrick and Brian [was: Re: Intentions of XMP] from Brian McBride on 2002-09-28 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from September 2002)

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 15:53:10 +0100
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "RDF Core WG 7332#" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020928154934.055912e0@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>

At 11:29 27/09/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote:

[...]

>I hope so, if you now understand why the non-mnemonic test with
>no range assertions is insufficient to clarify a tidy versus
>untidy MT.

I don't think so.  I don't know what a "non-mnemonic" test is, but I do 
understand that the test you are using is a test for something other than 
the definition of tidyness the WG has been using, since it can produce 
different results.

Brian

Received on Saturday, 28 September 2002 10:55:55 UTC