W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Re: The case for untidy literal semantics

From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 15:17:40 -0400
Message-ID: <3D90BA54.65E0BCC@mitre.org>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>


To make things crystal clear (hah!), could you state what you understand
"tidy" and "untidy" semantics to be in your summary?


Brian McBride wrote:
> As I said earlier, with the aim of building stronger consensus around the
> tidy/untidy decision, I've been through the submissions last week in
> support of untidy literal semantics and I've tried to summarize my
> understanding of them here.  There are some editorial comments
> intertwined.  Feel free, to send suggestions/corrections.

Frank Manola                   The MITRE Corporation
202 Burlington Road, MS A345   Bedford, MA 01730-1420
mailto:fmanola@mitre.org       voice: 781-271-8147   FAX: 781-271-8752
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2002 15:17:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:15 UTC