- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 19:42:31 +0200
- To: "\"Patrick Stickler\" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
> Sure, but you and Patrick might like to get on the phone and sort out > precisely where you have an issue. I am of the view this is a minor disagreement, where both sides have a case. Hence best resolved by a straw poll or something like that. Patrick you could try phoning me before the telecon tomorrow (also in the morning). I am now in Pisa at: +39 050 315 2032 > > BTW, I note that your proposal would mean that the abstract syntax would > have an alphabet that included the reals, i.e. is not countable. Such > things sometimes matter to mathematicians, no doubt because their proofs > rely on countability. I trust we are all right on that score? > > Shooting in the dark > Brian > > > >I think the test case would suffice as input. > > > > > >Jeremy > >
Received on Thursday, 12 September 2002 13:42:36 UTC