- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 12:35:35 +0200
- To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
[...] > > but then how would you write (in RDF/XML) > > <something> <someproperty> "somestring" . > > which I consider as a very meaningful statement > > Jos, which are you trying to express here: > > 1. That <something> has <someproperty> with the value denoted by "somestring". > 2. That <something> has <someproperty> with the value of the string "somestring". > > ??? none of the above Patrick, just 3. the object of that statement *is* the typeless lexical form "somestring" I think we need the primitive notion of a typeless lexical form which is just denoting itself and of course it could be paired with a rdfs:Datatype to describe a datatyped value but it must also exist independently I think and identified with itself -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ PS again sorry Brian, but our Lotus Notes seems to deform your name To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> which is causing some trouble I guess, so I corrected the CC
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2002 06:36:43 UTC